NY judge has some fun with Louis Vuitton "hangover" and Privacy

  Louis Vuitton's image of a bear protecting her cubs to protect.

Earlier this year, Louis Vuitton successfully receiving a Hyundai Louis Vuitton sued basketball in his car advertising.

Piggyback on that success has been set yet another attempt by Louis Vuitton, this time pursuing his film for Warner Brothers Hangover include a scene with a knockoff Louis Vuitton luggage and a mistranslation of the common American name "Louis". But in this case, Louis Vuitton has lost.

How was it different from Hyundai?

Hangover in the case, federal judge Andrew Carter of Manhattan, said the case that Warner Brothers' use of the famous monogram under the First Amendment protection was dismissed because it will be used only as a joke, reports Reuters.

Hyundai did differ, Carter was clearly the automaker to sell the brand Louis Vuitton, although humorous, in an effort to cars. Hyundai is a car company with aspirations to be a top-class, and a humorous essay by French designer could not communicate properly, the benefits for Hyundai would first require the approval of Louis Vuitton.

With Warner Brothers film producers did not try the class, citing Louis Vuitton luggage are transferred in their film. Instead, it was the character in the film is an eccentric goofball Screwup and its use (and mispronunciation) of Louis Vuitton was purely for the sake of humor, told Reuters. So on the one hand, Hyundai has had with Louis Vuitton to sell cars while on the other hand, Warner Brothers was with Louis Vuitton to laugh.

Carter said the stupid iness character Zack Galifianakis, referring to a scene in which he repeatedly referred to Thailand, "thigh-land" and notes that the airport scene, Alan's reference to her Louis Vuitton bag "is so funny because he talks little French "Louis, like the English" Lewis. "Judge Carter certainly enjoyed popcorn research involved in this case.

Louis Vuitton is noisy protection of his mark in an infringement procedure. The French designer Hyundai strike, but lost to Warner Brothers. A New York judge has found that differences in the study by Louis Vuitton in particular comes to be funny.